@grok is this true?
I've talked a ltlle bit about the misuse of artificial intelligence in the past entry, but I fear I have an
example of probably the worst case of AI image model usage you've ever seen. You might be familiar with Grok chatbot, one of the
biggest and most
well-funded AI company owned by Elon Musk for X.
If you are an X user, you probably are aware that since around the end of last year Grok has just
been undressing people without their consent. The AI had been accepting thousands of image editing prompts from users in the social media platform to create non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII) of random people online.
Actual prompts from users online.
As you can imagine, there were tons of women, maybe even men, and unfortunately even children that were having their clothes removed without any
consent provided. And of course, those children can't even provide consent for that kind of crap.
AI is very resource-heavy to run locally but now Grok had made it very accessible. Most people that use X have access to xAI's Grok. Any average user can use this tool and commission a deepfake for their personal gratification.
Of course, when given powerful creative tools, a significant portion of humanity will use them for the most degenerate purposes. This incident had just exposes a (large) group of bad
faith users with sick desires that
have and will always exist.
The thing is, it is possible to build a safe AI image models such as OpenAI and
Gemini that won't let you do these kinds of things. I suspect xAI made a deliberate decision to give Grok some personality to unlock more appeal and capability to some users. This can be seen based on some of its responses that shows more right-leaning personality, like when it repeatedly referred to itself as “MechaHitler”, or when it suggested Adolf Hitler as the right person to deal with “anti-white hate”. My point is, making AI have any personality is difficult and most of the time it will overshoot the mark.
On a concluding note, I personally am struggling to find the net-positive uses for generative AI (for art, video, music), especially when weighed against the harms. It shouldn't be surprising that many people hate Al when their entire frame of reference is its a machine that turns an unholy amount of Earth's fresh water into low quality spam contents and child porn.
More than ever now people would have the moral imperative to not post any photographs of their/other children online. At least I would not.


Comments
Post a Comment